Grading Content & Exposing Bias

Lindsay Clancy Case · Developing story · 2 reports

Clancy attorney now contests evidence she killed her children after mistrial

Average grade & lean unlock with a free account — no card required.

Video: Clancy attorney now contests evidence she killed her children after mistrial

Clancy attorney now contests evidence she killed her children after mistrial

Sep 29, 2026

The CBS News segment discussed the latest court hearing in the Lindsay Clancy case following a mistrial in her triple-murder trial. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington argued to the judge that prosecutors cannot prove Clancy killed her children, citing no direct admission or evidence of strangulation, and urged a not-guilty finding. Legal analyst Jessica Levenson explained this as a strategic shift aimed at the judge rather than a jury, noting it avoids credibility issues with an insanity defense and puts the prosecution on notice about alleged investigative flaws. The DA has not decided on a retrial, weighing the 11-1 jury split favoring the defense, resources, and possible plea options. The broadcast relied on the anchor, Levenson, and implied court statements without named outside experts or graphics beyond basic context. It highlighted the change in defense approach from the first trial, where psychological experts supported lack of criminal responsibility due to postpartum psychosis.

Source: CBS News

Video: Reddington seeks holdout juror’s cell phone in postponed Clancy hearing

Reddington seeks holdout juror’s cell phone in postponed Clancy hearing

Sep 28, 2026

The Fox News segment on “Outnumbered” features Kayleigh McEnany discussing new details ahead of Lindsay Clancy’s September 29 hearing with the holdout juror’s attorney, Edward Paltzik. It covers Kevin Reddington’s motion to examine “Juror Doe” Michael’s cell phone for 48 hours, impounded juror questionnaires, and potential bar complaint against Reddington for post-mistrial comments labeling the juror an “obstructionist.” The motion was adjourned with DA consent pending Judge Sullivan’s order. The discussion questions whether the 11-1 split favoring not guilty by reason of insanity followed jury instructions on postpartum psychosis versus legal clarity, and why Reddington did not use peremptory strikes earlier.

Source: Fox News