Megyn Kelly Covers Clancy Trial Rebuttal as 'Mortal Sin' Remark Prompts Mistrial Bid
Source: Megyn Kelly · All Megyn Kelly reports
Unlock the full scoreboard
Letter grade, factuality, lean, and rationales — free with registration. No card required.
See grades free How grading works
Already have an account? Sign in. The full report below is free to read.
Embed this grade
Disagree with this grade or political lean?
Flagging is open to every reader with a free account. Sign in or create one to dispute this report.
Topics in this report
Summary
The Megyn Kelly segment reports on the nearing end of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial in Plymouth, Massachusetts. Clancy has admitted strangling her three children — Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months) — on January 24, 2023, in Duxbury but pleads not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, claiming postpartum psychosis caused a command hallucination. Prosecutors' rebuttal expert, forensic psychologist Dr. Kirk Heilbrun, testified the isolated 18-minute hallucination claim was highly unusual, more consistent with her own intrusive thoughts than true psychosis, and suggested the deaths were altruistic filicide tied to her suicide attempt so the children would not suffer without her.
The broadcast played clips of Heilbrun's testimony, including the 'Go to God, baby' statements, which led to his mention of Clancy's Catholic upbringing and suicide as a 'mortal sin.' This prompted a defense mistrial motion citing prosecutorial misconduct (the second such reference in the trial). Kelly interviewed no guests but provided commentary dismissing the motion as ridiculous and tactical. The judge denied the mistrial but struck the religious testimony and instructed the jury to disregard it.
Editorial Assessment
The segment accurately recaps the day's events and Heilbrun's skepticism toward the defense's psychosis claim, which aligns with prosecution experts' views that Clancy retained capacity to appreciate wrongfulness under Massachusetts law. However, viewers miss broader context: the defense has its own experts, including Dr. Phillip Resnick, who testified she was 'frankly psychotic' with a command hallucination and delusion of influence. Postpartum psychosis is rare but documented, often emerging within weeks of birth though symptoms can persist; experts disagree on its application here.
Kelly's framing downplays the religious testimony as harmless while criticizing the defense for seeking a mistrial, potentially skewing perception that the prosecution's case is overwhelmingly strong and the insanity plea frivolous. The judge's strong rebuke of the religious inquiry as 'inappropriate' and 'irrelevant' is presented but minimized. Overall, solid factual recap of rebuttal testimony but one-sided commentary that favors the prosecution's narrative on mental state.
Key Moments
Clancy heard a voice she'd never heard before only during the 18 minutes it took to kill her children and never since.
Direct from Heilbrun's trial testimony, as reported across CNN, Court TV, and Boston Globe coverage.
This pattern of hallucination is very unusual and smells convenient, as symptoms only during the offense can lessen culpability.
Heilbrun's exact words in rebuttal testimony; he diagnosed bipolar II rather than acute psychosis.
Clancy said 'Go to God, baby' while strangling the children, expecting to meet them in heaven, and was asked if suicide is a mortal sin given her Catholic faith.
Heilbrun testimony; prompted immediate sidebar, mistrial motion, and judge striking the religious portion.
The defense motion for mistrial over the mortal sin reference is ridiculous and much ado about nothing.
Kelly's opinion; judge denied mistrial but strongly reprimanded prosecution, called religion 'absolutely an inappropriate area of testimony,' and instructed jury to disregard.
Even if altruistic filicide, killing children out of perceived love is not a defense.
Consistent with Massachusetts law: prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that defendant had substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness and conform conduct to law.
Notable Concerns
- One-sided commentary dismissing mistrial motion as tactical without noting judge's criticism of prosecution for allowing the religious testimony twice
- Minimizes potential prejudice of injecting defendant's Catholic faith and 'mortal sin' into an insanity trial focused on appreciation of wrongfulness
Sources Consulted
- Lindsay Clancy trial judge denies mistrial request as psychologist expresses doubts
- Lindsay Clancy’s attorney accuses prosecutors of ‘intentional misconduct’ after 2nd reference to ‘mortal sin’
- Lindsay Clancy trial (live updates): Prosecution to call final rebuttal witness after near mistrial
- Live updates: Lindsay Clancy trial continues after judge denies motion for mistrial
- Model Jury Instructions on Homicide: Criminal responsibility
- What the Church Really Teaches About Suicide